Buildkite vs TeamCity
On the evidence we track, Buildkite leads this comparison with a composite score of 59/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for ci/cd tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Buildkite
LeaderA CI/CD platform providing flexible pipeline orchestration, automated test optimization, and supply chain security. Supports cloud-hosted and self-managed agents with built-in test analytics, package registries, and integrations across development tools.
TeamCity
Not documented yet.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Buildkite
LeaderFree tier available. Pro from $30/user/month. Enterprise custom pricing.
- PersonalFree
- 3 concurrent jobs
- 1 user
- 90-day build retention
- 250 managed tests
- 50k test executions/month
- +1 more
- Pro$30/active user/month
- Unlimited concurrent jobs
- Unlimited users
- All Linux and Mac M4 agent sizes
- Cache volumes
- Git mirror volumes
- +2 more
- EnterpriseContact sales
- SCIM/SAML/ADFS
- Audit logs
- Build exports
- Pipeline templates
- Premium support SLA
TeamCity
Pricing not documented yet.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Buildkite
Leader- GitHub
- GitHub Enterprise
- Bitbucket Server
- AWS ECR
- AWS S3
- AWS CloudFormation
- AWS IAM
- AWS CloudWatch
- Docker
- Kubernetes
- Jenkins
- CircleCI
- NPM
- PyPI
- RubyGems
- Maven
- Apt
- RPM
- Helm
- Alpine
- Jest
- Mocha
- Cypress
- Playwright
- +11 more
TeamCity
Not documented yet.
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.