vioscaleAI
Comparison

Browser Use vs LaVague

On the evidence we track, Browser Use leads this comparison with a composite score of 72/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Browser Use full profile →LaVague full profile →
Machine formatsMarkdownJSONGraphQLMarkdown is open. JSON and GraphQL need a free key.
★Browser Use72
LaVague32
Score
vioscaleAI score
Browser Use72 / 100high · 77%
LaVague32 / 100low · 41%
Pricing
Free tier
Browser Use✓
LaVague✓
Model
Browser Usefreemium
LaVagueopen_source
Price level
Browser Uselow
LaVaguefree
Starting price
Browser Use$0.02
LaVague–
Transparent
Browser Use✓
LaVague–
Integrations
Count
Browser Use1,000
LaVague4
Security
Certifications
Browser UseSOC 2 Type II
LaVague–
Gdpr
Browser Use✓
LaVague✓
Hipaa
Browser Use✓
LaVague–
Soc2
Browser Use✓
LaVague–
Trust center
Vulnerabilities
Adoption
Dependent repos
Browser Use0
LaVague0
Github stars
Browser Use117,985
LaVague6,389
Activity
Commits last 30d
Browser Use53
LaVague0
Release
Cadence days
Browser Use8
LaVague–
History
Browser Use20 items
LaVague–
License
Spdx
Browser UseMIT
LaVagueApache-2.0
Language
Primary
Browser UsePython
LaVaguePython
Market
Availability
Browser UseAvailable worldwide
LaVague–
Content
Faq
Browser Use7 items
LaVague5 items

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for browser computer use agents. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Capabilities
Architecture model
Browser UseCloud hosted headless infrastructure
LaVagueOpen source playwright library
Navigation engine
Browser UseHybrid vision and dom
LaVague-
Hosted headless cloud infrastructure provided
Browser Use✓
LaVague✗
Captcha and cloudflare antibot evasion built in
Browser Use✓
LaVague-
Multi tab and concurrent session management
Browser Use✓
LaVague-
Chrome extension injection support
Browser Use-
LaVague✓
Residential ip proxy rotation network
Browser Use✓
LaVague-
Anthropic computer use API compatibility
Browser Use✓
LaVague-
Session recording and video replay debugging
Browser Use✓
LaVague-
Element caching and fast reattachment cookies
Browser Use✓
LaVague-
SOC2 type ii
Browser Use✓
LaVague-
Mit or apache permissive oss license
Browser Use✓
LaVague✓
Pricing model
Browser UsePer minute cloud compute
LaVagueFree open source

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Browser Use

Leader

Provides fully hosted AI agents that complete web automation tasks, along with remote browser infrastructure. Includes support for multiple AI models, automatic CAPTCHA solving, and residential proxy management.

Independently observed

LaVague

An open-source framework enabling developers to build intelligent agents capable of automating web interactions, testing, process automation, and information retrieval by combining a world model with action engines that execute instructions via Playwright or Selenium.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Browser Use

Leader
from $0.02/hourUsage-basedFree tier

From $0.02/hour for browsers, $5/GB for proxies. Free tier with $1 credit per person.

  • Pay as you go$0.02/hour for browser time, $5/GB for residential proxies
    • Browser automation and task execution
    • Residential and custom proxy support
    • Automatic CAPTCHA solving
    • Multi-session management with scaling tiers
    • Support for Anthropic Claude and other AI models
as of verify ↗

LaVague

Open sourceFree tier
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Browser Use✓
LaVague✓
CLI
Browser Use✓
LaVague✓
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Browser Use✓
LaVague✗
Self-hosted
Browser Use✓
LaVague✓

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

In common (1)
  • Playwright

Browser Use

Leader
10 total - 9 not shared
  • Gmail
  • Slack
  • Notion
  • Model Context Protocol (MCP)
  • Puppeteer
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • Chrome
  • Computer Use
Independently observed

LaVague

4 total - 3 not shared
  • OpenAI API
  • Selenium
  • Chrome Extension
Independently observed
Still deciding?

Browser Use or LaVague: which one depends on you

A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.

Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.