Comparison

Browser Use vs LaVague

On the evidence we track, Browser Use leads this comparison with a composite score of 70/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
Browser Use70
LaVague21
Score
Vioscale score
Browser Use70 / 100low · 42%
LaVague21 / 100low · 12%
Pricing
Free tier
Browser Use
LaVague
Model
Browser Usecommercial
LaVaguecommercial
Price level
Browser Usemid
LaVagueunknown
Starting price
Browser Use$29
LaVague
Transparent
Browser Use
LaVague
Integrations
Count
Browser Use1,000
LaVague
Adoption
Dependent repos
Browser Use0
LaVague0
Github stars
Browser Use110,846
LaVague6,389
Activity
Commits last 30d
Browser Use100
LaVague0
Release
Cadence days
Browser Use5
LaVague
History
Browser Use20 items
LaVague
License
Spdx
Browser UseMIT
LaVagueApache-2.0
Language
Primary
Browser UsePython
LaVaguePython
Market
Availability
LaVague

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for browser computer use agents. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Capabilities
Architecture model
Browser UseCloud hosted headless infrastructure
LaVagueOpen source playwright library
Navigation engine
Browser UseHybrid vision and dom
LaVague-
Hosted headless cloud infrastructure provided
Browser Use
LaVague-
Captcha and cloudflare antibot evasion built in
Browser Use
LaVague-
Multi tab and concurrent session management
Browser Use
LaVague-
Chrome extension injection support
Browser Use-
LaVague
Residential ip proxy rotation network
Browser Use
LaVague-
Anthropic computer use API compatibility
Browser Use
LaVague-
Session recording and video replay debugging
Browser Use
LaVague-
Element caching and fast reattachment cookies
Browser Use-
LaVague-
SOC2 type ii
Browser Use
LaVague-
Mit or apache permissive oss license
Browser Use
LaVague
Pricing model
Browser UsePer minute cloud compute
LaVagueFree open source

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Browser Use

Leader

A cloud-based platform for web automation that allows artificial intelligence agents to navigate websites, interact with elements, submit forms, and extract information. Offers both a managed service with anti-bot detection capabilities and an open-source library for local deployment.

Independently observed

LaVague

An open-source framework enabling developers to build intelligent agents capable of automating web interactions, testing, process automation, and information retrieval by combining a world model with action engines that execute instructions via Playwright or Selenium.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Browser Use

Leader
from $29/moHybridFree tier

Free to start, $0.02/browser-hour on pay-as-you-go, or subscriptions from $29–$999/month

  • FreeFree
    • 3 concurrent sessions
    • 10 agent tasks per month
    • Free browser access
  • Pay as you go$0.02/browser-hour, no subscription
    • $0.02 per browser-hour
    • No monthly minimum
    • Proxy and egress charges separate
    • Unlimited agent tasks
  • Dev$29/month
    • 25 concurrent sessions
    • $29/month in usage credits
    • Advanced stealth features
  • Business$299/month
    • 200 concurrent sessions
    • $299/month in usage credits
  • Scaleup$999/month
    • 500 concurrent sessions
    • $999/month in usage credits
    • Residential proxy discount ($4/GB)
  • EnterpriseContact sales
    • Custom credit pool
    • Service-level agreements
    • Negotiated data-retention policies
    • Dedicated support
as of verify ↗

LaVague

free_open_source
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Browser Use
LaVague
CLI
Browser Use
LaVague
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Browser Use
LaVague
Self-hosted
Browser Use
LaVague
Hybrid
Browser Use
LaVague

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

Browser Use

Leader
3 total
  • Gmail
  • Slack
  • Notion
Independently observed

LaVague

Not documented yet.

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.