Comparison

Blackfire vs Parca

On the evidence we track, Blackfire leads this comparison with a composite score of 64/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsMarkdownJSONGraphQLMarkdown is open. JSON and GraphQL need a free key.
★Blackfire64
Parca40
Score
vioscaleAI score
Blackfire64 / 100medium · 70%
Parca40 / 100medium · 53%
Pricing
Free tier
Blackfire✗
Parca✓
Model
Blackfirecommercial
Price level
Blackfiremid
Parcafree
Transparent
Blackfire✓
Parca✓
Integrations
Count
Blackfire6
Parca1
Security
Disclosure policy
Blackfire✓
Parca–
Hipaa
Blackfire✓
Parca–
Iso27001
Blackfire✓
Parca–
Pci
Blackfire✓
Parca–
Scorecard
Blackfire–
Parca5.5
Soc2
Blackfire✓
Parca–
Reliability
Status page
Blackfire✓
Parca–
Adoption
Dependent repos
Blackfire–
Parca40
Github stars
Blackfire–
Parca4,994
Activity
Commits last 30d
Blackfire–
Parca11
Release
Cadence days
Blackfire–
Parca75
History
Blackfire–
License
Spdx
Blackfire–
Language
Primary
Blackfire–
Content
Faq
Blackfire6 items
Parca5 items

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for apm tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Instrumentation
Auto-instrumentation
Blackfire✓
Parca✓
Distributed tracing
Blackfire✓
Parca-
Insight
Service map
Blackfire-
Parca-
Code / continuous profiling
Blackfire✓
Parca✓
Database monitoring
Blackfire✓
Parca-
Error analytics
Blackfire-
Parca-
Real-user monitoring
Blackfire✓
Parca-
SLO / error-budget tracking
Blackfire-
Parca-
Intelligence
Anomaly / root-cause AI
Blackfire-
Parca-
Standards
OpenTelemetry support
Blackfire-
ParcaNone
Core
Language agents
BlackfirePHP, Python
ParcaC, C++, Rust, Go, and more
Deployment
Hosting
BlackfireCloud only
ParcaSelf-hosted only

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Blackfire

Leader

A tool for testing and scraping web services, with a domain-specific language for crawling HTTP services, validating responses, and extracting data from HTML, XML, and JSON.

Independently observed

Parca

Infrastructure-wide continuous profiling that analyzes CPU and memory consumption down to individual functions, requiring zero instrumentation and operating with minimal overhead.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Blackfire

Leader
from €33.25/moSubscription

From €33.25/month (Development, annual) to €158.25/month (Production, annual with 2 months free). Demo environment available; free plan for GitHub Student Developer Pack members.

  • Production€158.25/month billed yearly (2 months free) or €189.90/month
    • Profiling
    • Performance Monitoring
    • Continuous Profiling
    • Alerting
    • Continuous Testing
    • +16 more
  • Development€33.25/month billed yearly (yearly only)
    • Profiling
    • Manual assertions
    • Upsun integration
as of verify ↗

Parca

Open source
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Blackfire✗
Parca✓
Linux
Blackfire✗
Parca✓
CLI
Blackfire✓
Parca✓
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Blackfire✓
Parca✗
Self-hosted
Blackfire✗
Parca✓

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

Blackfire

Leader
6 total
  • PHPUnit
  • Symfony Functional Tests
  • Behat
  • GitHub Education
  • CI/CD pipelines
  • Upsun
Independently observed

Parca

1 total
  • Kubernetes
Independently observed
Still deciding?

Blackfire or Parca: which one depends on you

A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.

Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.