Azure Site Recovery vs Cohesity
No leader: the top candidate Azure Site Recovery has only 0.22 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for disaster recovery. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Azure Site Recovery
A cloud-based solution designed to help organizations maintain business continuity by providing disaster recovery and system restoration capabilities.
Cohesity
A data protection and management platform that consolidates fragmented backup, archive, file, and analytics infrastructure into a unified, cloud-scale system. Provides disaster recovery, snapshot-based protection, and multi-cloud data tiering for enterprises and managed service providers.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Azure Site Recovery
Not documented yet.
Cohesity
- Pure Storage FlashArray
- Amazon Web Services
- Google Cloud
- Microsoft Azure
- Pure Storage FlashArray//M
Azure Site Recovery or Cohesity: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.