AWS Elastic Load Balancing vs MetalLB
No leader: the top candidate AWS Elastic Load Balancing has only 0.28 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for load balancers. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
AWS Elastic Load Balancing
A managed load balancing service that distributes incoming traffic across multiple targets and availability zones. Supports application, network, gateway, and classic load balancer types with automatic scaling and security features.
MetalLB
Provides network load balancing functionality for bare metal Kubernetes deployments that lack built-in cloud provider integrations, addressing the limitation that standard Kubernetes load balancers only work with cloud platforms.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
AWS Elastic Load Balancing
Free tier for 6 months (750 hours/month classic+ALB, 15 LCUs for ALB). After free tier, usage-based pricing per LCU or NLCU processed. New customers receive up to $200 in free credits.
- Application Load BalancerFree
- Network Load BalancerFree
- Classic Load BalancerFree
- Gateway Load Balancer-
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.