AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery
No leader: the top candidate AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery has only 0.34 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for disaster recovery. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
A managed service that enables organizations to replicate and recover their applications and data to AWS with minimal downtime, using pay-per-server hourly pricing and point-in-time recovery capabilities.
Azure Site Recovery
Microsoft's disaster recovery platform that replicates and recovers business-critical applications and infrastructure to minimize downtime and data loss when failures occur.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
$0.028 per server per hour; additional charges for AWS EBS, EC2, and snapshots
- Per-Server Hourly$0.028/server/hour plus AWS resource charges
- Continuous data replication
- Test launches
- Recovery launches
- Point-in-time recovery
- Post-launch actions
- +2 more
Azure Site Recovery
Pay-as-you-go usage-based pricing with free trial
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.