Astro vs Hugo
On the evidence we track, Astro leads this comparison with a composite score of 72/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for static site generators. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Astro
LeaderAstro is a web framework that prioritizes performance through server-side rendering and sends minimal JavaScript to browsers. It features an island architecture for selective interactivity, supports all major UI frameworks, and produces zero unnecessary JavaScript by default.
Hugo
An open-source static site generator written in Go, designed for speed and flexibility. Supports multiple content types, templating, image optimization, and multilingual sites, making it suitable for documentation, corporate websites, blogs, and various other web projects.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- Tailwind CSS
Astro
Leader- React
- Vue
- Svelte
- Vercel
- Cloudflare Workers
- Node.js
- Prism
- MDX
- Sitemap
- Starlight
- Sentry
- UnoCSS
- Expressive Code
- astro-icon
- astro-seo
- Fathom Analytics
- Feedback Fish
- Cloudflare
- Sonda
- Solid
Hugo
- PostCSS
- Dart Sass
- Chroma
- esbuild
- LibSass
Astro or Hugo: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.