Comparison

Ansible vs Foreman

On the evidence we track, Ansible leads this comparison with a composite score of 64/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsMarkdownJSONGraphQLMarkdown is open. JSON and GraphQL need a free key.
★Ansible64
Foreman51
Score
vioscaleAI score
Ansible64 / 100medium · 65%
Foreman51 / 100low · 10%
Pricing
Free tier
Ansible✓
Foreman–
Model
Ansiblecommercial
Price level
Ansiblelow
Foremanfree
Integrations
Count
Ansible22
Foreman12
Security
Disclosure policy
Ansible–
Foreman✓
Gdpr
Ansible–
Foreman✓
Scorecard
Ansible7.5
Foreman–
Trust center
Adoption
Dependent repos
Ansible2,140
Foreman–
Github stars
Ansible70,980
Foreman–
Package downloads weekly
Ansible1,964,190
Foreman–
Activity
Commits last 30d
Ansible35
Foreman–
Release
History
Ansible20 items
Foreman–
License
Spdx
AnsibleGPL-3.0
Foreman–
Language
Primary
AnsiblePython
Foreman–
Market
Availability
Ansible–
Content
Faq
Ansible6 items
Foreman6 items

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for configuration management tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Core
Architecture
AnsibleAgentless / SSH-push
Foreman-
Push / pull model
Ansible-
ForemanBoth
Config language
Ansible-
Foreman-
Deployment
Masterless mode
Ansible✓
Foreman-
Hosting
AnsibleSelf-hosted only
ForemanSelf-hosted only
Correctness
Idempotent
Ansible-
Foreman-
Model
Desired-state declarative
Ansible✓
Foreman✓
Ecosystem
Content registry
Ansible-
Foreman-
Platform
Windows support
Ansible-
Foreman-
Scope
Cloud provisioning
Ansible✓
Foreman✓
Governance
Policy / compliance
Ansible-
Foreman✓
Commercial
Enterprise edition
Ansible-
Foreman-
Licensing
Open-source core
Ansible✓
Foreman✓

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Ansible

Leader

A system for automating infrastructure provisioning, configuration management, and application deployment across multiple machines via standard SSH without requiring agent installation on remote systems.

Independently observed

Foreman

A complete management solution for system administrators to automate server deployment, configuration, and monitoring across on-premise and cloud environments, with built-in support for configuration management tools like Puppet, Salt, and Ansible.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Ansible

Leader
HybridFree tier

Free open-source version or paid enterprise platform

  • Ansible (Open Source)Free
  • Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformContact sales
as of verify ↗

Foreman

Open source
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Ansible✗
Foreman✓
CLI
Ansible✓
Foreman✓
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Ansible✗
Foreman✓
Self-hosted
Ansible✓
Foreman✓
Hybrid
Ansible✗
Foreman✓

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

In common (1)
  • VMware

Ansible

Leader
22 total - 21 not shared
  • Terraform
  • ServiceNow
  • AWS
  • Microsoft Azure
  • Google Cloud Platform
  • Cisco
  • Juniper
  • F5
  • HPE
  • Dell Technologies
  • NetApp
  • SAP
  • Pure
  • Palo Alto Networks
  • CyberArk
  • HashiCorp Vault
  • Splunk
  • Dynatrace
  • Infoblox
  • Aruba
  • Windows
Independently observed

Foreman

16 total - 15 not shared
  • Puppet
  • Salt
  • Ansible
  • MaaS
  • Amazon EC2
  • Google Compute Engine
  • OpenStack
  • Libvirt
  • oVirt
  • LDAP
  • FreeIPA
  • Redmine
  • Discourse
  • GitHub
  • Bare Metal (MaaS)
Independently observed
Still deciding?

Ansible or Foreman: which one depends on you

A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.

Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.