Amazon Aurora vs MySQL
On the evidence we track, MySQL leads this comparison with a composite score of 65/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for relational databases. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Amazon Aurora
A hosted relational database service that requires no infrastructure management, automatically scales with demand, and ensures high availability across regions. It supports PostgreSQL and MySQL databases, and offers a distributed variant for larger-scale deployments.
MySQL
LeaderMySQL is an open-source SQL database server. MySQL Cluster extends it with real-time transaction processing capabilities for distributed deployments.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Amazon Aurora
Pricing not documented yet.
MySQL
LeaderCommunity edition free; Enterprise/Standard/Classic editions require contacting sales
- MySQL Community ServerFree
- MySQL Enterprise EditionContact sales
- MySQL Standard EditionContact sales
- MySQL Classic EditionContact sales
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Amazon Aurora or MySQL: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.