Amass vs Microsoft Defender EASM
On the evidence we track, Microsoft Defender EASM leads this comparison with a composite score of 51/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for attack surface management. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Amass
A framework that identifies external assets and attack surfaces through reconnaissance and open-source intelligence gathering techniques, helping security professionals understand their organization's external exposure.
Microsoft Defender EASM
LeaderA cloud-based security service that discovers internet-facing resources and identifies vulnerabilities to help organizations proactively manage their external attack surface and security risks.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Amass
- GitHub
- GitLab
- Shodan
- Bing
- SecurityTrails
- Greynoise
- HackerOne
Microsoft Defender EASM
LeaderNot documented yet.
Amass or Microsoft Defender EASM: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.