Comparison

ActiveMQ vs Inngest

No leader: the top candidate ActiveMQ has only 0.22 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
ActiveMQ67
Inngest61
Score
Vioscale score
ActiveMQ67 / 100low · 22%updating
Inngest61 / 100medium · 74%updating
Pricing
Free tier
ActiveMQ
Inngest
Model
ActiveMQcommercial
Inngestcommercial
Price level
ActiveMQfree
Inngestlow
Transparent
ActiveMQ
Inngest
Integrations
Count
ActiveMQ
Inngest5
Reliability
Status page
ActiveMQ
Inngest
Adoption
Dependent repos
ActiveMQ7,528
Inngest2
Github stars
ActiveMQ2,451
Inngest5,765
Package downloads weekly
ActiveMQ
Inngest1,746,391
Activity
Commits last 30d
ActiveMQ39
Inngest88
Release
Cadence days
ActiveMQ
Inngest1
History
ActiveMQ18 items
Inngest20 items
License
Spdx
ActiveMQApache-2.0
InngestApache-2.0
Language
Primary
ActiveMQJava
InngestGo

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for message queues. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Core
Messaging paradigm
ActiveMQPub/sub
InngestDurable execution
Correctness
Delivery guarantee
ActiveMQ-
InngestAt-least-once
Ordering guarantee
ActiveMQ-
Inngest-
Durability
Durable replayable log
ActiveMQ
Inngest
Message replay / rewind
ActiveMQ-
Inngest
Interop
Wire protocol
ActiveMQAMQP, STOMP, MQTT, JMS
InngestHTTPS
Kafka-protocol compatible
ActiveMQ-
Inngest
Scale
Partitioned horizontal scaling
ActiveMQ
Inngest
Geo / cross-region replication
ActiveMQ-
Inngest-
Consumption
Consumer groups / competing consumers
ActiveMQ-
Inngest
Dead-letter queue
ActiveMQ-
Inngest-
Deployment
Managed cloud offering exists
ActiveMQ
Inngest
Hosting
ActiveMQCloud + self-hosted
InngestCloud + self-hosted
Processing
Built-in stream processing
ActiveMQ-
Inngest

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

ActiveMQ

A message broker that facilitates asynchronous communication between services regardless of programming language, using standardized protocols. Supports high-availability configurations and can be deployed on-premises or through managed cloud services.

Independently observed

Inngest

Provides an execution layer that automatically handles durability, retries, and state management for background jobs, scheduled tasks, and AI workflows through code-based function definitions.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

ActiveMQ

Open sourceFree tier

Open source and free to download and use. Professional support available from commercial vendors.

as of verify ↗

Inngest

from $0.50/moSubscriptionFree tier

Free tier available. Pro from $99/mo + metered usage.

  • HobbyFree
    • 50k executions
    • 5 concurrent executions
    • 500 MB span data ingested
    • 10K scores
    • 500k events ingested
    • +6 more
  • ProStarting at $99/mo + metered usage
    • 1M executions included
    • Pay as you go up to 20M
    • 100+ concurrent executions
    • 5 GB span data ingested
    • 50K scores
    • +8 more
  • EnterpriseContact sales
    • Custom executions
    • Custom concurrent executions
    • Custom span data ingested
    • Custom scores
    • Custom events ingested
    • +5 more
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
ActiveMQ
Inngest
Windows
ActiveMQ
Inngest
Linux
ActiveMQ
Inngest
CLI
ActiveMQ
Inngest
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
ActiveMQ
Inngest
Self-hosted
ActiveMQ
Inngest

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

ActiveMQ

Not documented yet.

Inngest

5 total
  • Datadog
  • Vercel
  • OpenAI
  • Discord
  • Deno
Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.