accessiBe vs axe-core
No leader: the top candidate axe-core has only 0.32 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for accessibility testing. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
accessiBe
Combines automated accessibility scanning, expert manual testing, and continuous monitoring to help organizations ensure their websites comply with regulations like WCAG, ADA, and EAA, with litigation support included in enterprise plans.
axe-core
An open-source JavaScript testing framework that analyzes websites and HTML-based interfaces to identify accessibility violations and compliance issues. It integrates into existing test environments and returns detailed violation reports in JSON format.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
accessiBe
- Essential-
- Automatic monthly scans
- AI based auditing & monitoring
- Ticketing system integrations
- Dedicated onboarding
- In-app fix guidance
- Pro-
- Bi-weekly scan frequency
- Federated Login using Google
- CI/CD integrations (SDK)
- EnterpriseContact sales
- Weekly scan frequency
- No user limits
- Custom Legal and SLA
- Single Sign-On
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
accessiBe
- Jenkins
- CircleCI
- GitLab
- Jira
- Asana
- ClickUp
- WordPress
- Concrete CMS
- OpenCart
- Chrome
- Microsoft Word
- Microsoft PowerPoint
- Adobe Acrobat
axe-core
- VS Code (axe-linter extension)
- npm/pnpm (package manager)
- GitHub Actions
- Puppeteer
- Selenium
- Jest
- Testing frameworks
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.