# Metasploit Framework alternatives

The highest-scoring alternative to Metasploit Framework in Penetration Testing is **Pentera** (82/100), against Metasploit Framework's 39/100. Ranked on independent signals, not user reviews. No vendor pays for placement.

| # | Alternative | Score | Confidence | Compare |
|--:|---|--:|---|---|
| 1 | [Pentera](https://www.vioscale.ai/software/pentera) | 82 | 15% (low) | [Metasploit Framework vs Pentera](https://www.vioscale.ai/compare/metasploit-framework-vs-pentera) |
| 2 | [Impacket](https://www.vioscale.ai/software/impacket) | 43 | 27% (low) | [Metasploit Framework vs Impacket](https://www.vioscale.ai/compare/impacket-vs-metasploit-framework) |
| 3 | [BloodHound](https://www.vioscale.ai/software/bloodhound) | 24 | 3% (low) | [Metasploit Framework vs BloodHound](https://www.vioscale.ai/compare/bloodhound-vs-metasploit-framework) |
| 4 | [NetSPI](https://www.vioscale.ai/software/netspi) | 5 | 15% (low) | [Metasploit Framework vs NetSPI](https://www.vioscale.ai/compare/metasploit-framework-vs-netspi) |

Metasploit Framework itself ranks #3 of 5 in Penetration Testing.

---
*Source: Vioscale (https://www.vioscale.ai/alternatives/metasploit-framework). Generated 2026-09-01T14:58:08.554Z.*